Today's hottest deals

Dell MXP061

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell MXP061  (all builds)
MotherboardDell
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '18 at 16:00
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 T7400-$110
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 24
2-Core 49.5
33% 46.1 Pts
4-Core 48.9
8-Core 49.5
7% 49.2 Pts
64-Core 49.6
3% 49.6 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI MOBILITY RADEON X1800
Dell(1028 200A) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.561.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.48% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 2.04
Parallax 0.91
1% 1.28 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.48%
Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Goodram C40 120GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S9FM01.9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.2% Poor
Read 128
Write 79.3
Mixed 81.7
21% 96.4 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 2.83
54% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 22.2
DQ Write 42.7
DQ Mixed 3.52
11% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 67%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 101
Write 109
Mixed 58.7
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.33
92% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.5% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 3.6
11% 4 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.93 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback