Casper MW1/HW1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 7%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemCasper MW1/HW1  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta MW1/HW1
Memory1.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20051118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '16 at 18:34
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium M processor 1.73GHz-$29
U1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Memory 26.8
1-Core 16.5
2-Core 16.6
15% 20 Pts
4-Core 16.5
8-Core 16.7
2% 16.6 Pts
64-Core 16.7
1% 16.7 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 6600
Quanta(152D 0748) 128MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 7.15.11.7948
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
0.63% Terrible
Lighting 1.17
Reflection 0.54
Parallax 0.06
1% 0.59 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.63%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9808210A 80GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.05 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 20.3
Write 21.1
Mixed 13.3
14% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 0.56
4K Mixed 0.21
48% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
8.48% Terrible
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.3
8% 2.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 2.5
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 274
15% 274 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.48%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback