Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '18 at 02:51
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 74.8
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 122
54% 87.6 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 274
31% 241 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Lighting 22.4
Reflection 21.6
Parallax 27.9
18% 24 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 26.5
Splatting 22.9
21% 26.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
109GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 479
Write 377
Mixed 398
93% 418 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 20.8
108% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 37.1
DQ Write 59.5
DQ Mixed 54.3
39% 50.3 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 462
Write 306
Mixed 319
80% 362 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 17.6
100% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 98.4
DQ Mixed 15.7
38% 80.8 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
209GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 96.3
Write 92.2
Mixed 91.6
70% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.38
104% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-894.A00LF 9905403-890.A00LF 16GB
1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.3% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 10.6
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,460 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $377
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback