Apple iMac5,1

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Apple iMac5,1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Apple Mac-F42786A9
Memory	1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070627
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 16 '18 at 18:04
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 T7200-$80 2,351 User benchmarks, average bench 32% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	34.2% Below average	Memory 61.9 1-Core 19.7 2-Core 41.6 30% 41.1 Pts	4-Core 42.6 8-Core 35.6 5% 39.1 Pts	64-Core 41.5 3% 41.5 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 430 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Apple(106B 0080) 128MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.561.0.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.34% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 0.73 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.51 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.34% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 12939 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 561 (B1) Unknown 98 98 32 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 52 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 225 (F1) Unknown 99 99 24790780733	29.5% Poor	Read 125 Write 97.9 Mixed 103 24% 109 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 26.3 4K Mixed 12.1 58% 19.2 MB/s	DQ Read 22.1 DQ Write 27.3 DQ Mixed 17 15% 22.2 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 124%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 20GB free, PID 1051 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 18.5 Write 26.1 Mixed 22.4 30% 22.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 0.57 4K Mixed 0.24 29% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 2.9 10% 3.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 2.2 7% 2.6 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical iMac5,1 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Apple iMac5,1

CPU
Core2 T7400Intel $110Bench 33%, 673 samples	1x
Core2 T7200Intel $80Bench 32%, 2,351 samples	1x

GPU
Mobility Radeon X1600ATIBench 0%, 430 samples	2x

RAM
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	1x
2GBUnknownBench 15%, 9,823 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 43% - Average

Total price: $110

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Apple iMac5,1

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Apple iMac5,1

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)