Asus M2N-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M2N-E  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20060925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '18 at 18:52
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 3800+-$84
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Memory 62.7
1-Core 29.6
2-Core 57.9
34% 50.1 Pts
4-Core 58.1
8-Core 58.8
8% 58.4 Pts
64-Core 58.8
4% 58.8 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X1800 Series
AMD(1002 0B12) 512MB
Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.56.1.16
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
0.88% Terrible
Lighting 1.63
Reflection 2.58
Parallax 1.59
1% 1.93 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.88%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 58.0
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 65.8
Write 68.4
Mixed 57.9
48% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.33
90% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST3250620AS 250GB-$149
233GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
44% Average
Read 75.2
Write 77.9
Mixed 70.3
56% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.4
95% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44%
Great: 43%
Seagate ST3250824AS 250GB-$148
223GB free
Firmware: 3.AA
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 62.5
Write 56.2
Mixed 62.4
46% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.17
4K Mixed 0.4
93% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N-E Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback