Today's hottest deals

Asus AM1M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus AM1M-A  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '18 at 11:27
Run Duration94 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 5150 APU R3
FS1b , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
34.6% Below average
Memory 54.8
1-Core 25
2-Core 49.5
30% 43.1 Pts
4-Core 85.4
8-Core 91.3
12% 88.4 Pts
64-Core 93.6
6% 93.6 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
Asus(1043 8623) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.351.1001.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.01% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 4.88
Parallax 3.03
2% 3.37 fps
MRender 3.14
Gravity 2.07
Splatting 3.52
2% 2.91 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.01%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.0
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 103
Write 104
Mixed 103
78% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.45
111% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1600KLH-4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 6
17% 5.83 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 7
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AM1M-A Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus AM1M-A - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $336
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback