Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	7.91GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7.91GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	4.2 GB free of 7.90625 GB @ 0 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '18 at 12:40
Run Duration	89 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	77%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E312xx (Sandy Bridge) 43 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	38.4% Below average	Memory 58.4 1-Core 67.7 2-Core 93.5 45% 73.2 Pts	4-Core 108 8-Core 109 15% 109 Pts	64-Core 108 7% 108 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 65%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 236GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 16 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 100 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 69 522125343	33.5% Below average	Read 377 Write 87.5 Mixed 159 45% 208 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 9.46 4K Mixed 8.43 41% 11.6 MB/s	DQ Read 21.5 DQ Write 16.5 DQ Mixed 8.31 9% 15.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x7GB 828 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1 of 1 slots used 7GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 7.3 28% 9.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 3 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 121%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $499