ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock A790GXH/128M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	26.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asrock A790GXH/128M (all builds)
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20091125
Uptime	5.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 02 '16 at 18:09
Run Duration	274 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 B50 3,245 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Memory 81.7 1-Core 47.3 2-Core 94.9 49% 74.6 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 191 25% 189 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140 47,409 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Sapphire(174B E271) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	26.2% Poor	Lighting 32.7 Reflection 30.4 Parallax 41.6 27% 34.9 fps	MRender 27.1 Gravity 27.8 Splatting 35.3 25% 30.1 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 26%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 100 15461336 (03) Spinup time 93 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 44 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 696908 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 155 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 10 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 67 554893338 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 3 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 263 (C2) HDA temperature 26 40 81604378650 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 124970663411760 (F1) Unknown 100 253 5995867566 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1141561507	75.4% Very good	Read 129 Write 134 Mixed 81.5 85% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.21 82% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 96%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 931GB free Firmware: JP4OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 84 84 10223828 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 95 (03) Spinup time 118 118 25790775616 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 11113 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 140 140 30 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 41597 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 315 (C0) Power-off retract count 91 91 11930 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 91 91 11930 (C2) HDA temperature 240 240 240519086105 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 2 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	71.9% Very good	Read 119 Write 132 Mixed 34.7 69% 95.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.45 108% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 74%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 834GB free (System drive) Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 249 234 7516 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 539 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 37 37 46303 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 389 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 216 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 539 (C2) HDA temperature 115 87 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 13 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	52.9% Above average	Read 94.2 Write 90 Mixed 37.6 54% 73.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 2.16 4K Mixed 0.31 90% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 76%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 564GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 149 140 9516 (04) Start/Stop count 86 86 14405 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 47 47 39102 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 333 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 170 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 152 152 144906 (C2) HDA temperature 127 88 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	45.1% Average	Read 72.5 Write 84.4 Mixed 26.8 45% 61.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.29 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.1 56% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 477GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 230 223 7475 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10887 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 56 56 32763 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 200 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 89 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 32 32 506953 (C2) HDA temperature 128 95 22 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	42.1% Average	Read 69.9 Write 76.6 Mixed 46.4 48% 64.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.19 79% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 67%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 373GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 183 177 5816 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11750 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 50 50 37108 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 368 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 210 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 124 124 230048 (C2) HDA temperature 125 90 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	41.2% Average	Read 71.5 Write 71.8 Mixed 53.1 49% 65.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.55 4K Mixed 0.12 55% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 63%
HGST TOURO S 1TB 180 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 520GB free, PID 1023 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 27.3 Write 25.2 Mixed 25.8 33% 26.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.16 45% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 9.1 25% 8.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 7.8 20% 6.87 GB/s	Latency 77.4 52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback