Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 5 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Memory 69.4 1-Core 110 2-Core 216 73% 132 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 221 29% 217 Pts	64-Core 213 13% 213 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GRID M10-1Q 78 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Nvidia(10DE 11CF) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.3 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Lighting 19.1 Reflection 14.4 Parallax 16.9 16% 16.8 fps	MRender 21.3 Gravity 21.1 Splatting 15.3 15% 19.3 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Citrix Virtual Disk 161GB 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: PVS Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Xensrc PVDISK 26GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 23GB free Firmware: 2.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80% Excellent	Read 417 Write 424 Mixed 439 96% 427 MB/s	4K Read 38.6 4K Write 32.1 4K Mixed 31.7 116% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 40.9 DQ Write 37.8 DQ Mixed 33.5 27% 37.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x15GB 628 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1 of 1 slots used 15GB DIMM RAM Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	MC Read 24.4 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 22.8 62% 21.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 16.4 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 112%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 55%

Gunboat

CPU
Xeon E5-2623 v4IntelBench 59%, 42 samples	16x
Xeon Gold 5315YIntelBench 71%, 25 samples	14x
Xeon Silver 4215RIntelBench 62%, 17 samples	13x

GPU
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples	9x
RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples	7x
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 131%, 1,749 samples	6x

SSD
PVDISK 268GBXensrcBench 53%, 95 samples	53x
PVDISK 2TBXensrcBench 50%, 16 samples	5x
Virtual Disk 107GBMicrosoftBench 60%, 85 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16