Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	19.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4 (all builds)
Memory	9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100625
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '16 at 15:54
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 95.1 1-Core 74.4 2-Core 148 65% 106 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 370 42% 328 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5870 10,176 User benchmarks, average bench 19% XFX(1682 2961) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	19.8% Very poor	Lighting 27.6 Reflection 14.9 Parallax 25.3 22% 22.6 fps	MRender 12.5 Gravity 21.1 Splatting 19.1 15% 17.6 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 20%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3984 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 790 (B1) Unknown 99 99 12 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 59 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 29 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8855249268	60.3% Good	Read 262 Write 177 Mixed 185 46% 208 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 45.8 4K Mixed 24.1 111% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 99 DQ Mixed 68.3 68% 111 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 118%
GRAID 4TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2TB free Firmware: 0000 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Read 147 Write 119 Mixed 93.4 89% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.96 4K Write 3.57 4K Mixed 0.47 159% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 77%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 784GB free Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 174 4166 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3085 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11223 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2465 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 120 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2964 (C2) HDA temperature 121 96 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 169 30	77.2% Very good	Read 136 Write 133 Mixed 123 98% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.02 4K Write 2.37 4K Mixed 0.38 129% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 76%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 509GB free Firmware: 1AA0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 49 899 (03) Spinup time 75 75 8260 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 5795 (05) Reallocated sector count 95 95 237 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13456 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3373 (0D) Soft read error rate 99 50 875 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 8528 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 89 57 185270283 (C2) HDA temperature 81 56 319488019 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 64884 (C4) Reallocation count 99 99 21 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 10 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 99 88 525 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	34.8% Below average	Read 72.4 Write 48.3 Mixed 68.6 48% 63.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.94 4K Mixed 0.46 108% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	42.1% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 12.7 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 12.1 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 56.9 70% 56.9 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55-UD4 Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	22x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	21x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	8x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	5x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	5x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	7x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	3x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	13x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	11x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $475

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16