Today's hottest deals

K-systems A6GMV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemK-systems A6GMV  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN A6GMV
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100722
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 04 '18 at 18:39
Run Duration96 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 640-$70
Socket AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 39.7
2-Core 70.9
41% 60.5 Pts
4-Core 87.6
8-Core 104
12% 95.9 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 6390
PowerColor(148C 3000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
2.33% Terrible
Lighting 2.97
Reflection 3.77
Parallax 3.25
2% 3.33 fps
MRender 2.14
Gravity 2.93
Splatting 2.74
2% 2.61 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.33%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD105SI 1TB
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 58.7
Write 76.7
Mixed 48.2
46% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.37
81% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TMS2GB364E082139CM TMS2GB364E082139CM 4GB
667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.33 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.17 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A6GMV Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: K-systems A6GMV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback