Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2 1,377 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Memory 53.1 1-Core 77.3 2-Core 146 52% 92.1 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 617 55% 463 Pts	64-Core 2,125 132% 2,125 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 74%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI Logical Volume 998GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 616GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3000 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 45% Great: 88%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 44,403 User benchmarks, average bench 196% 477GB free Firmware: 3L1QCXY7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	179% Outstanding	Read 1,899 Write 1,265 Mixed 1,431 340% 1,532 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 28.6 4K Mixed 18.1 78% 24.3 MB/s	DQ Read 29.7 DQ Write 71 DQ Mixed 90.9 58% 63.9 MB/s
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 259%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 190 Mixed 171 137% 183 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.2 87% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0-CMA 8x16GB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 8 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	100% Outstanding	MC Read 51.2 MC Write 38 MC Mixed 38 121% 42.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 5.5 18% 6.4 GB/s	Latency 150 27% 150 ns
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 120%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	146x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	114x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	67x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16