Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 76.6 2-Core 143 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 331 35% 281 Pts	64-Core 284 18% 284 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 67%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 050E) 2GB Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.89% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 4.58 Parallax 1.38 2% 2.67 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.87 2% 2.68 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.89% Great: 2%
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M 15,328 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Dell(1028 050E) 2GB CLim: 672 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 369.9 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	3.37% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 4.85 Parallax 3.41 3% 4.12 fps	MRender 5.86 Gravity 4.33 Splatting 2.96 3% 4.38 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.37% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
RevuAhn_850X1_256GB 256GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: N0530C SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 337 344 342 335 338 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	63% Good	Read 348 Write 345 Mixed 240 SusWrite 338 72% 318 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 37.8 4K Mixed 20.5 68% 24.1 MB/s	DQ Read 68.7 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 111 101% 147 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB 15,815 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	47.8% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.3 48% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 14 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	438x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	131x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	103x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	84x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	41x
SH564128FH8NZPHSCG 2x4GBSmartBench 43%, 552 samples	35x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $228