Asus B75M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics84.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive43.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus B75M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140707
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJul 21 '18 at 12:10
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 94.3
1-Core 93.4
2-Core 193
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 486
48% 393 Pts
64-Core 488
30% 488 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1598 MHz, MLim: 1917 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 117
Parallax 105
88% 110 fps
MRender 94.4
Gravity 102
Splatting 87.4
77% 94.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480 GB 480GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 74 2.6 9.5 75 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 440
Write 384
Mixed 328
SusWrite 69.1
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 13
62% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 6.6
DQ Mixed 41.8
36% 56.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 57%
Samsung PM810 2.5" 7mm 128GB
45GB free
Firmware: AXM08D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 230 232 227 231 234 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 242
Write 242
Mixed 163
SusWrite 228
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 42.1
4K Mixed 17.4
69% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 53
DQ Mixed 24.6
35% 67.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 50%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
439GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 87 89 85 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 98.3
Write 71.8
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 87.1
58% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 79%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
253GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 33.3
Write 28.7
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 28.9
37% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.8
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75M-PLUS Builds (Compare 742 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B75M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $335
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback