PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Fujitsu ESPRIMO P9900 (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D2912-A1 |
Memory | 8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110406 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Jul 23 '18 at 09:22 |
Run Duration | 194 Seconds |
Run User | GRC-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
48.8%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
Gigabyte(1458 34CD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
|
0.49%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 46 63 53 53 58 MB/s
|
38.9%
Below average
|
|||
56%
Above average
|
||||
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
167GB free, PID 1018
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 15 16 15 16 15 MB/s
|
9.81%
Terrible
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7
15GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 21 21 16 12 MB/s
|
13.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
26.1%
Poor
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 23x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 15x |
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 8x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 7x |
GeForce GT 420NvidiaBench 2%, 9,903 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 46% - Average | Total price: $150 |