Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130 21,755 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Memory 63.7 1-Core 63.7 2-Core 79.8 45% 69.1 Pts	4-Core 91.8 8-Core 156 15% 124 Pts	64-Core 129 8% 129 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 14C2) 2.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.61% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 0.85 Parallax 0.62 0% 0.71 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.17 1% 0.86 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.61% Great: 1%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 121GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 207 Write 146 Mixed 197 41% 183 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 35.2 4K Mixed 19.1 68% 23.6 MB/s	DQ Read 193 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 184 138% 184 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB 2,689 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 272GB free, PID 1f05 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 28.8 Write 5 Mixed 8.5 14% 14.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-041.A01LF 02FE EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 6GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.4% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 8.5 21% 7.33 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 5.5 14% 4.9 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16