bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	25% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	VMware, VMware Virtual Platform
Motherboard	Intel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150921
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Aug 22 '18 at 16:29
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 3 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU socket #0, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	61.9% Good	Memory 76.4 1-Core 71.2 2-Core 145 58% 97.5 Pts	4-Core 274 8-Core 281 37% 278 Pts	64-Core 292 18% 292 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 67%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 43GB 241 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 7.1 6.5 6.8 6.9 7.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	25% Poor	Read 300 Write 21.5 Mixed 118 SusWrite 7.1 24% 112 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 9.5 4K Mixed 11.8 35% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 38.3 DQ Write 30.1 DQ Mixed 39.6 28% 36 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 25% Great: 77%
Vmware Virtual disk 54GB 222 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 23GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 6.9 6.5 6.5 6.6 7.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	28.8% Poor	Read 361 Write 254 Mixed 236 SusWrite 6.8 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 10 4K Mixed 14 38% 11.3 MB/s	DQ Read 48.2 DQ Write 28 DQ Mixed 33.4 26% 36.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 77%
Vmware Virtual disk 11GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 10GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 7 6.6 7.1 6.8 7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	28.4% Poor	Read 359 Write 29.8 Mixed 142 SusWrite 7.1 29% 134 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 9.2 4K Mixed 12.7 38% 10.9 MB/s	DQ Read 44.2 DQ Write 31.5 DQ Mixed 36.9 28% 37.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 94%
Vmware Virtual disk 2GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 7 6.6 7.1 7 7.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.3% Poor	Read 350 Write 30.8 Mixed 164 SusWrite 7.1 30% 138 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 11.4 4K Mixed 14.4 37% 11.4 MB/s	DQ Read 40.3 DQ Write 37.1 DQ Mixed 37.7 29% 38.4 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 64 slots used 8GB DIMM DRAM Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	51.6% Above average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 18.1 53% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 14.6 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 87.5 46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,023x
Core i7-2600Intel $192Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,568x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	932x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,141x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	821x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	456x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	425x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	516x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16