Alienware Aurora-R3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware Aurora-R3  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 046MHW
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '18 at 16:14
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 203
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 504
53% 425 Pts
64-Core 534
33% 534 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Lighting 50.4
Reflection 46.3
Parallax 41.3
41% 46 fps
MRender 39.6
Gravity 42.4
Splatting 37.4
32% 39.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 36 27 49 50 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 57.3
Write 57.4
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 42.6
37% 49.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 35%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
853GB free
Firmware: AX00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 108 109 109 111 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 112
Write 110
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 105
66% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 62%
Maxtor 6G160E0 160GB
80GB free
Firmware: KA10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 48 46 47 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 54.5
Write 53.4
Mixed 32.9
SusWrite 46.8
34% 46.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.3
114% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 37%
SAMSUNG HM160HC 160GB
148GB free, PID 6830
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
6.1% Terrible
Read 7
Write 7.2
Mixed 7
SusWrite 7.4
10% 7.15 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.1%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown OCZ3P1600LV2 Samsung M378B5273CH0 OCZ3P1600LV2 Samsung M378B5273CH0 12GB
1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.2% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R3 Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: Alienware Aurora-R3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $585
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback