| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1496 |
| Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20180510 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 13 '18 at 11:47 |
| Run Duration | 94 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 87% |
PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
52.7%
Above average
|
54% 79.8 Pts
|
12% 92.7 Pts
|
6% 90.5 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 5450
MSI(1462 2231) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.892.2.3000
|
1.23%
Terrible
|
1% 1.85 fps
|
1% 1.66 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
74% 331 MB/s
|
90% 29.8 MB/s
|
34% 48.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 CT4G3S160BM.M16FKD 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
43.4%
Average
|
41% 14.3 GB/s
|
40% 13.8 GB/s
|
60% 67.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC Builds (Compare 277 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite USDT PC
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-2400SIntel $70Bench 60%, 10,987 samples | 136x |
| Core i5-2500SIntelBench 64%, 3,031 samples | 40x |
| Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 28x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 266x |
| Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples | 3x |
| Radeon R9 M200XAMDBench 10%, 678 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $98 |