bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel NUC6i7KYB
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160817
Uptime3 Days
Run DateOct 01 '18 at 17:13
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6770HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
67% Good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 190
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 398
46% 360 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
Intel(8086 2064) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 14.7
12% 13.3 fps
MRender 10.5
Gravity 13.6
Splatting 21.3
13% 15.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend MTS800 M.2 256GB-$141
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1225G
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 447
Write 366
Mixed 161
72% 325 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 31.5
91% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 108
108% 178 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 97%
SAMSUNG HD502HI 500GB
2GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 104
Write 57.3
Mixed 52.3
82% 71 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1.03 MB/s
SAMSUNG HD502IJ 500GB
5GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 44 44 43 63 75 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.7% Poor
Read 68
Write 72.2
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 51.7
80% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 28%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 118
Write 174
Mixed 94.8
SusWrite 0.4
128% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 1
386% 4.17 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 11.1
DQ Mixed 1
413% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 92%
WDC WD10 EZEX-07WN4A0 1TB
931GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 45 43 63 75 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47% Average
Read 186
Write 179
Mixed 126
SusWrite 52.2
174% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
138% 1.73 MB/s
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
129GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 51 52 51 51 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 91
Write 84.5
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 51
95% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.8
216% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 52.4
MC Mixed 22.2
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 16.9
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 87.9
46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback