Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME Z370-A (all builds)
Memory	26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180427
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '18 at 18:40
Run Duration	205 Seconds
Run User	LBN-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	97.7% Outstanding	Memory 93.3 1-Core 130 2-Core 280 92% 168 Pts	4-Core 549 8-Core 910 89% 729 Pts	64-Core 1,138 70% 1,138 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 97.7% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.43 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Lighting 39.1 Reflection 30.8 Parallax 37.2 32% 35.7 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 37.5 Splatting 35.7 30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 340GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 468 469 475 408 291 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 466 Mixed 432 SusWrite 429 102% 455 MB/s	4K Read 40.1 4K Write 93 4K Mixed 50.5 175% 61.2 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 358 269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 129%
Kingston SSDNow KC400 512GB-$180 2,804 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 477GB free Firmware: SAFM00.Y SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 466 467 471 475 481 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 469 Mixed 303 SusWrite 469 97% 433 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 84.2 4K Mixed 38.1 133% 49.5 MB/s	DQ Read 292 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 67.2 121% 236 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 108%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$95 26,217 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 153 154 151 157 156 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Read 141 Write 146 Mixed 62.8 SusWrite 154 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 108%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB 4,473 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 33GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 51 49 49 49 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	23.3% Poor	Read 51.3 Write 51.8 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 49.6 64% 47.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 52%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB 4,473 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 32GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 53 54 54 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	Read 52.5 Write 52.5 Mixed 38 SusWrite 53.5 67% 49.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 52%
ST310005 28AS 1TB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 117GB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 38 38 38 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Read 38 Write 39.3 Mixed 30.2 SusWrite 37.8 49% 36.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 20%
ST310005 24AS 1TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 308GB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.9 4.8 4.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 38 Write 38.5 Mixed 29.2 SusWrite 4.8 35% 27.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB 3,679 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 30.7 MC Mixed 25 82% 28.5 GB/s	SC Read 19.7 SC Write 33.7 SC Mixed 26.7 76% 26.7 GB/s	Latency 61.5 65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 110%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 100%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	5,956x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	2,112x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	930x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	1,111x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	1,064x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	740x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	536x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	489x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	405x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	842x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	314x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	306x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $926

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16