Gigabyte GA-H77-DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H77-DS3H  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131114
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 07 '18 at 18:42
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 94.1
1-Core 94.2
2-Core 190
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 364
49% 365 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.94% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 5.73
Parallax 3.87
4% 4.84 fps
MRender 6.14
Gravity 4.87
Splatting 3.57
4% 4.86 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.94%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 122 129 124 102 86 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.4% Average
Read 222
Write 199
Mixed 193
SusWrite 112
41% 182 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 27.7
89% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 26.2
DQ Write 46
DQ Mixed 32.5
26% 34.9 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 124%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
21GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 66 66 67 67 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 63.7
Write 58.8
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 65.2
44% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 86%
WD VelociRaptor 250GB-$35
74GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 66 66 67 67 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60% Good
Read 144
Write 133
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 65.6
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 60%
Great: 111%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129
2.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 128 131 127 104 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 134
Write 123
Mixed 78
SusWrite 116
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 99%
WDC WD60 EFRX-68L0BN1 6TB
316GB free, PID 0569
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 111 111 112 111 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.4% Average
Read 108
Write 107
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 110
143% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
119% 1.43 MB/s
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
183GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 24.3
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 26.7
35% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.9% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 19.3
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 18.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H77-DS3H Builds (Compare 1,001 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77-DS3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback