Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	MSI MS-7882
Motherboard	MSI X99A GAMING 9 ACK (MS-7882) (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160411
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '18 at 16:53
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	62.6% Good	Memory 57.7 1-Core 107 2-Core 200 66% 122 Pts	4-Core 363 8-Core 577 58% 470 Pts	64-Core 724 45% 724 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3732) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	22.4% Poor	Lighting 36.7 Reflection 20.7 Parallax 36 30% 31.1 fps	MRender 2.57 Gravity 5.6 Splatting 17.6 8% 8.58 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7KM120HAFD-0E005 120GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: GXM1003Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 391 384 369 368 381 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 429 Write 416 Mixed 350 SusWrite 382 89% 394 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 37.7 4K Mixed 31 93% 30.2 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 162 124% 167 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 112%
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80 11,055 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 153GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 79 77 79 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 91 Write 100 Mixed 68.5 SusWrite 82.1 63% 85.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.4 114% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 61%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 4GB 7,184 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 1GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 3.7 3.7 3.5 3.9 4 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	6.45% Terrible	Read 18 Write 4 Mixed 5 SusWrite 3.4 8% 7.6 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.4 52% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.45% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB 4,583 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 2134 MHz Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	85% Excellent	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 41.6 MC Mixed 30.4 98% 34.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 14.9 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 117%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	7x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	6x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	5x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $102Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	5x

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $419

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16