Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	40.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101116
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 03 '16 at 02:17
Run Duration	95 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 B55 3,005 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Memory 82 1-Core 44 2-Core 94.3 48% 73.4 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 120 19% 136 Pts	64-Core 161 10% 161 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120 20,573 User benchmarks, average bench 38% Sapphire(174B E308) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Lighting 51 Reflection 53.6 Parallax 66.5 42% 57 fps	MRender 51.7 Gravity 46.8 Splatting 40.8 37% 46.5 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 40%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNC128GCSJ 128GB 1,192 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: CJLA0201 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 25606 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1030 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 1189800969514 (AA) Unknown 100 100 283484356690 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4329242976 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 244 (C2) HDA temperature 67 45 236224512033 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	34.3% Below average	Read 200 Write 149 Mixed 151 37% 167 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 9.95 53% 20.2 MB/s	DQ Read 14.4 DQ Write 62 DQ Mixed 11.4 17% 29.3 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-153.A00LF 9905403-153.A00LF PSD32G133381 PSD32G133381 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.6% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 11.5 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 6.6 15% 5.13 GB/s	Latency 76.9 52% 76.9 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 234 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

CPU
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	48x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	40x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	31x

GPU
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples	20x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $52Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	5x

RAM
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GBCorsairBench 48%, 1,822 samples	6x
CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F CT51264BA160B.C16F 16GBUnknownBench 37%, 54 samples	6x
XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 47%, 2,501 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $268

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16