Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3 (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20130123
Uptime	13 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '19 at 15:17
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$129 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Memory 78.5 1-Core 67.4 2-Core 132 56% 92.8 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 374 37% 303 Pts	64-Core 375 23% 375 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7770 38,053 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Sapphire(174B E244) 1GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.7.1 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Lighting 17.5 Reflection 16.4 Parallax 22.6 14% 18.8 fps	MRender 13.9 Gravity 16.1 Splatting 18.7 14% 16.2 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingdian S280 120GB 1,698 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1008A SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 154 145 144 141 145 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	61.4% Good	Read 353 Write 308 Mixed 297 SusWrite 159 63% 279 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 43.9 4K Mixed 34.3 110% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 41.2 DQ Write 88 DQ Mixed 54.2 44% 61.1 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 109%
Samsung HD252HJ 250GB 8,167 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 170GB free Firmware: 1AC01113 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 91 87 94 90 89 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Read 81.5 Write 42.3 Mixed 53.7 SusWrite 90.8 50% 67.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 58%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB 12,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 272GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 136 139 139 138 140 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 122 Write 123 Mixed 63.2 SusWrite 138 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Kllisre DDR3 2x8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.4% Average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 13.7 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 10.3 27% 9.33 GB/s	Latency 83.3 48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-970A-DS3 Builds (Compare 351 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3 - $149

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	61x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	46x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	18x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	18x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	18x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
MX500 1TBCrucial $74Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	8x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	8x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	63x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	59x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	33x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $366

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16