PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 16.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | INTEL_ DH55TC__ |
Motherboard | Intel DH55TC (all builds) |
Memory | 0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20111206 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 18 '19 at 15:17 |
Run Duration | 4435 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 53% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
44.4%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
17.2%
Very poor
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 78 67 69 19 8.4 MB/s
|
16.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
520GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 79 68 70 22 11 MB/s
|
48.1%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5471-028.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
25.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples | 45x |
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples | 17x |
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 11x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 48x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 6x |
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $88 |