HP Compaq Elite 8300 Convertible MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 Convertible MT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3396
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130716
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '19 at 14:50
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 100 2-Core 197 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 506 53% 427 Pts	64-Core 489 30% 489 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 36.5 Reflection 30.3 Parallax 32.4 30% 33.1 fps	Gravity 35.1 Splatting 36.2 32% 35.7 fps
Poor: 27% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 4,879 Write 4407 Mixed 4629 1,036% 4,638 MB/s	4K Read 304 4K Write 208 4K Mixed 224 857% 245 MB/s	DQ Read 776 DQ Write 532 DQ Mixed 630 477% 646 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Crucial M500 240GB-$73 31,779 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 154GB free Firmware: MU05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 272 275 273 273 268 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	74.9% Very good	Read 419 Write 273 Mixed 292 SusWrite 272 70% 314 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 50.4 4K Mixed 26.9 93% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 305 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 186 166% 252 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 91%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20 41,230 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 13GB free Firmware: 21.02E25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 54 53 53 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	Read 46.8 Write 46.2 Mixed 37.8 SusWrite 53.2 34% 46 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 104GB free Firmware: JC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 88 90 90 91 90 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 93 Write 88.8 Mixed 62 SusWrite 89.4 61% 83.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 466GB free Firmware: JC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 116 115 115 116 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 107 Write 102 Mixed 65 SusWrite 115 72% 97.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.1 187% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173BH0-CK0 859B CT51264BA160BJ.M8F 859B CT51264BA160BJ.M8F 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.7% Above average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 16.1 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 16.6 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP Compaq Elite 8300 Convertible MT

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)