HP Compaq Elite 8300 Convertible MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 Convertible MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3396
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '17 at 16:59
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 199
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 504
54% 429 Pts
64-Core 506
31% 506 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.3% Below average
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 30.1
30% 32.4 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 36
30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$73
223GB free
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.9% Above average
Read 279
Write 268
Mixed 198
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 12.6
78% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 20.2
DQ Write 52.5
DQ Mixed 13.4
17% 28.7 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 91%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 386
Write 311
Mixed 293
73% 330 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 18.1
94% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 33.5
DQ Write 86.5
DQ Mixed 20.2
27% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20
69GB free
Firmware: 21.02E25 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 52.1
Write 53.4
Mixed 43.1
37% 49.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.32
99% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 55%
Hitachi HDT721032SLA360 320GB-$26
20GB free
Firmware: ST2OA3AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 91.6
Write 61
Mixed 88.2
61% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.2
79% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173BH0-CK0 859B CT51264BA160BJ.M8F 859B CT51264BA160BJ.M8F 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.5% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.1
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.3
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback