Medionpc MS-7681

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Medionpc MS-7681 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDIONPC MS-7681
Memory	6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110815
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 23 '19 at 22:12
Run Duration	399 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	57%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 88.8 2-Core 164 69% 114 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 411 43% 346 Pts	64-Core 412 26% 412 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 8616) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.4% Poor	Lighting 32.7 Reflection 23.3 Parallax 29.3 27% 28.5 fps	MRender 34.7 Gravity 32 Splatting 29.4 26% 32 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 257GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1C2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 40 41 64 44 60 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.5% Below average	Read 251 Write 154 Mixed 112 SusWrite 76.4 33% 148 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 18.1 4K Mixed 11.5 59% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 41.5 DQ Write 18.5 DQ Mixed 17.2 16% 25.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 102%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 27GB free Firmware: 4101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 105 109 105 100 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 215 Write 91.2 Mixed 125 SusWrite 101 30% 133 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 18.8 4K Mixed 16.7 55% 17.1 MB/s	DQ Read 88.9 DQ Write 69.4 DQ Mixed 90.4 65% 82.9 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 85%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 339GB free Firmware: AR13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 78 81 84 86 85 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 575GB free Firmware: AR17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 82 84 90 89 93 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 3.5TB free Firmware: AR17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 147 139 144 150 153 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$179 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 598GB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 119 123 124 124 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 104 107 109 110 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	64% Good	Read 116 Write 111 Mixed 79.3 SusWrite 107 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 87%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 3,868 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 663GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 26 Write 21 Mixed 18.3 SusWrite 16.4 27% 20.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 53%
1,995 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 15GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8.9 9.1 9 9.1 8.4 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	4.7% Terrible	Read 14.8 Write 8.3 Mixed 5.8 SusWrite 8.8 12% 9.43 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.7% Great: 6%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 772GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4 3.9 4 4 4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 22.3 Write 22.8 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 4 24% 18.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.6 188% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 78%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 314GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4 4 4 3.9 4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Read 25.2 Write 21 Mixed 19.8 SusWrite 4 22% 17.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 44%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 44GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4 4 3.9 4 4.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Read 22.5 Write 23 Mixed 23.5 SusWrite 4.1 24% 18.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.5 192% 2 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 78%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB 87 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 435GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4 3.9 4 4 4.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 25.5 Write 20.7 Mixed 21 SusWrite 4.1 23% 17.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GB 112 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.6% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 13.8 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 15.4 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 66 61% 66 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7681 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Medionpc MS-7681

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	14x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	4x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples	5x
R9 380AMD $200Bench 33%, 83,027 samples	3x
R9 280XAMD $500Bench 35%, 94,130 samples	3x

SSD
MZ7LN256HAJQ-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 82%, 2,092 samples	4x
850 Pro 512GBSamsung $190Bench 102%, 68,849 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GBSamsungBench 48%, 112 samples	6x
99U5471-012.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 99U5471-012.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 48%, 122 samples	5x
M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG M2F4G64CB8HB5N-CG 16GBNanyaBench 48%, 27 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $499

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16