Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2603 0 237 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	41% Average	Memory 47.1 1-Core 46.8 2-Core 91.5 37% 61.8 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 370 33% 279 Pts	64-Core 373 23% 373 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% HP(103C 079C) 3GB Ram: 3GB, Driver: 332.50 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Lighting 15.6 Reflection 14.2 Parallax 16.8 13% 15.5 fps	MRender 21.5 Gravity 14.2 Splatting 17 14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Cheetah 15K.7 SAS 300GB-$72 1,032 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 32 32 34 34 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 118 Write 34.8 Mixed 59.8 SusWrite 32.7 46% 61.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 1.5 294% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 111%
LSI Logical Volume 998GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 103GB free Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 84 80 64 70 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Read 193 Write 74.5 Mixed 55.3 SusWrite 72.9 72% 99 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 135%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB 7,850 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 1GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 7.2 7.3 6.9 3.3 5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	5.31% Terrible	Read 12.3 Write 7.5 Mixed 9.3 SusWrite 5.9 11% 8.75 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 57% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.31% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B5773DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U7EFR8C-PB M391B5773DH0-CK0 M391B5773DH0-CK0 M391B5773DH0-CK0 M391B5773DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U7EFR8C-PB M391B5773DH0-CK0 M391B57... 24GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.5% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 20.6 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 4 13% 4.6 GB/s	Latency 172 23% 172 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	146x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	114x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	67x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16