bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DP55WG
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100217
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '19 at 16:05
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
LGA 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 82.1
1-Core 62.8
2-Core 112
54% 85.5 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 217
25% 193 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.9% Poor
Lighting 38.5
Reflection 37.9
Parallax 32.4
31% 36.3 fps
MRender 34.9
Gravity 34.5
Splatting 22
24% 30.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 29 32 30 32 29 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.3% Average
Read 214
Write 202
Mixed 188
SusWrite 39
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 29.5
97% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 166
128% 176 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
31GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 80 80 80 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 46.5
Write 48.5
Mixed 39
SusWrite 80.1
39% 53.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 69%
WD WD5002ABYS-02B1B0 500GB
13GB free
Firmware: 02.03B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
40% Below average
Read 67.7
Write 65.2
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 71.2
46% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x393930353430332D3131342E4130304C4620 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
34.6% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 11.3
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 8.9
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback