Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	383% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130920
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 16 '16 at 02:43
Run Duration	398 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 95.1 2-Core 196 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 343 8-Core 469 51% 406 Pts	64-Core 492 30% 492 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120 38,521 User benchmarks, average bench 20% XFX(1682 7260) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.300.2511.0 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	20.8% Poor	Lighting 24.7 Reflection 29.3 Parallax 31 20% 28.3 fps	MRender 23.1 Gravity 23.4 Splatting 32.2 22% 26.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
OCZ RevoDrive 3 PCIe 120GB-$100 560 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 3649688 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 6 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 -83369610174971 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5574 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 2406 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3649688 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 6 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3649688 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3649688 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 0 (EA) Unknown 0 0 0 (F1) Unknown 0 0 18962 (F2) Unknown 0 0 33516	383% Outstanding	Read 3,606 Write 49.4 Mixed 106 261% 1,254 MB/s	4K Read 586 4K Write 3.23 4K Mixed 3.36 893% 197 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 383% Great: 69%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1TB free Firmware: AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 169 162 6516 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2251 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1286 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2247 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 749 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 195 195 17739 (C2) HDA temperature 122 102 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	54.8% Above average	Read 102 Write 88.9 Mixed 95.2 72% 95.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.21 85% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 67%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 931GB free Firmware: 1A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 162 157 6891 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10249 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11089 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2466 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 108 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10233 (C2) HDA temperature 119 98 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	48.1% Average	Read 83.7 Write 83.4 Mixed 80 62% 82.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.29 4K Mixed 0.35 103% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 51%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$63 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 931GB free Firmware: 0A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 195 188 6241 (04) Start/Stop count 85 85 15014 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 80 80 15272 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 90 90 10465 (C0) Power-off retract count 194 194 5243 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 143 143 171059 (C2) HDA temperature 112 104 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	57.8% Above average	Read 103 Write 98 Mixed 97.3 75% 99.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.37 94% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 57%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 488GB free Firmware: 0A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 185 176 7708 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1432 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1951 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1428 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1410 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 13307 (C2) HDA temperature 121 114 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0
Poor: 39% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18KSF51272AZ- Samsung M391B5773DH0- 18KSF51272AZ- Samsung M391B5773DH0- Samsung M391B5773DH0- Samsung M391B5773DH0- 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	74.5% Very good	MC Read 28.8 MC Write 29.2 MC Mixed 27.2 81% 28.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 13.2 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M720 POWER Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720 POWER

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	23x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	7x
Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	3x

SSD
HyperX 3K 240GBKingston $70Bench 81%, 27,495 samples	3x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	3x
Vector 256GBOCZ $240Bench 93%, 2,095 samples	2x

RAM
M391B5273DH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 85%, 136 samples	3x
M391B5273DH0- 8x4GBSamsungBench 83%, 37 samples	3x
M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- M391B1G73BH0- Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A Hynix HMT325U7CFR8A M378B5173QH0- M378B5173QH0- 44GBSamsungBench 82%, 5 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $474

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16