bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH55TC
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111206
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMar 16 '19 at 20:44
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 95.3
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 167
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 379
40% 318 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
PwrHis(1787 3000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.07% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.54
Parallax 1.53
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.43
1% 1.26 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.07%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 64GB-$56
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 44 33 31 27 26 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.3% Very poor
Read 226
Write 64
Mixed 84
SusWrite 35.1
22% 102 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 5.1
27% 7.67 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 48%
Seagate ST3160316AS 160GB
62GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 89 89 90 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 78.5
Write 71
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 89.5
54% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 56%
WD WD2500JB-00REA0 250GB-$150
64GB free
Firmware: 08.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 46
Write 49.2
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 36.9
30% 40.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 33%
Maxtor 4 R160L0 164GB
56GB free
Firmware: RAMB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 44
Write 42
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 36.9
28% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.2% Below average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 10.9
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 11.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 56.3
71% 56.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback