Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 01 '19 at 15:13
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 92.2
1-Core 74
2-Core 142
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 434
42% 344 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
ASRock(1849 5030) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1370 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.3.3
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.1% Above average
Lighting 66.1
Reflection 68.6
Parallax 89
54% 74.6 fps
MRender 69.6
Gravity 66.6
Splatting 55.5
51% 63.9 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 297 363 382 428 407 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 302
Mixed 427
SusWrite 361
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 50.8
166% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 39.3
DQ Write 82.6
DQ Mixed 51.7
42% 57.9 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 129%
Team T253LE240G 240GB
6GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 445
Write 280
Mixed 310
76% 345 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 28.6
112% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 159
137% 200 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 93%
Dell USB Portable HDD 1TB
31GB free, PID 9013
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 100 102 102 101 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 81.1
Write 36.8
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 97.2
83% 63.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.5% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 19.3
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 14.3
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback