| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Extreme9 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160329 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 12 '19 at 06:46 |
| Run Duration | 163 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.3%
Good
|
58% 94.2 Pts
|
36% 297 Pts
|
23% 374 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.5%
Poor
|
31% 38.4 fps
|
26% 32 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
98% 441 MB/s
|
160% 53.4 MB/s
|
195% 261 MB/s
| |
|
|
75% 335 MB/s
|
133% 46.3 MB/s
|
184% 244 MB/s
| |
|
|
607% 848 MB/s
|
11,946% 94.4 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown DDR3-2400 CL10 4GB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46%
Average
|
47% 16.4 GB/s
|
29% 10 GB/s
|
56% 71.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 990FX Extreme9 Builds (Compare 104 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme9 - $218
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 48x |
| FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 27x |
| FX-9370AMD $194Bench 62%, 9,054 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 8x |
| R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples | 5x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 5x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $638 |