Asrock FM2A85X Extreme6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A85X Extreme6  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 13 '19 at 04:16
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 79.8
1-Core 71.6
2-Core 124
57% 91.9 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 225
30% 224 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 3642) 2GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 16.1
Parallax 17.1
16% 17.7 fps
MRender 23.3
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 17
16% 20.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 224 223 224 219 219 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 399
Write 418
Mixed 356
SusWrite 227
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 42.6
144% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 258
193% 256 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
70GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 276 279 253 264 256 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.7% Above average
Read 188
Write 267
Mixed 202
SusWrite 265
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 35.1
4K Mixed 27.9
84% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 35.3
DQ Write 66.9
DQ Mixed 44.5
36% 48.9 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 124%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
404GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 91 90 92 93 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 94
Write 88.5
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 89.7
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 54%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$86
165GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 103 102 103 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 93.3
Write 91.5
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 102
66% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 100%
WD Elements 1TB
785GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 73 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 77.7
Write 79.1
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 73.5
95% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1333C9-8GAO F3-1333C9-8GAO 16GB
667, 667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.1% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A85X Extreme6 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A85X Extreme6 - $239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $498
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback