Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP270E4E-KD5BR
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140828
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 14 '19 at 20:22
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 847-$259 3,990 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	Memory 43.6 1-Core 19.5 2-Core 22.1 21% 28.4 Pts	4-Core 34.5 8-Core 42.6 5% 38.5 Pts	64-Core 34 2% 34 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 41%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: GG2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 78 59 53 63 61 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 62.1 Write 39.4 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 63.7 35% 47.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 830B NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	20.1% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 7.1 21% 7.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 6 13% 4.67 GB/s	Latency 186 22% 186 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

CPU
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	85x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	77x
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	37x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	189x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	40x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	35x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	14x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	6x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	25x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 2,928 samples	22x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16