PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 89.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds) |
Memory | 12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150805 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 17 '16 at 15:06 |
Run Duration | 160 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 37% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
52.9%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 270X-$199
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.300.2311.0
|
28.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
89.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate STM3500418AS 500GB
278GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
56.7%
Above average
|
|||
SAMSUNG HD103SI 1TB
160GB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
15.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
31.3%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 127x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 73x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 59x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 31x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 24x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 21x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $396 |