To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '19 at 16:53
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 89.6
2-Core 173
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 611
56% 470 Pts
64-Core 759
47% 759 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.5.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Lighting 26
Reflection 32.8
Parallax 31.2
21% 30 fps
MRender 28.9
Gravity 24.2
Splatting 34.3
24% 29.1 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 26 32 28 36 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 420
Write 36.8
Mixed 91.5
SusWrite 30
31% 145 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 8
42% 10.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 53%
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
112GB free
Firmware: UE360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 77 50 29 31 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.3% Poor
Read 232
Write 96.5
Mixed 122
SusWrite 59.4
28% 128 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 8.2
42% 10.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 53%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
584GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 123
Write 27
Mixed 23
SusWrite 41.1
39% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 75%
Kingston DT 101 II 4GB
4GB free, PID 1625
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
1.73% Terrible
Read 3.7
Write 3
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 3.1
4% 2.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.73%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 31.7
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback