PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20141202 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | May 25 '19 at 21:10 |
Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
Run User | PRT-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
62.2%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.39
|
26.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
628GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 116 114 137 128 119 MB/s
|
75.4%
Very good
|
|||
TOSHIBA USB 2.5"-HDD 320GB
252GB free, PID 0b03
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
|
7.02%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
42.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 513x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 326x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 186x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 139x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 127x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 91x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $171 |