| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H310M-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180716 |
| Uptime | 2.8 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 27 '19 at 10:42 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | SGP-User |
| Background CPU | 53% |
PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-8400-$131
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
63.3%
Good
|
66% 119 Pts
|
50% 394 Pts
|
35% 559 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 2445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.8%
Above average
|
46% 62 fps
|
66% 83.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$50
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 11 54 3.4 2.5 3.3 MB/s
|
33.5%
Below average
|
49% 220 MB/s
|
40% 12.9 MB/s
|
46% 78.4 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
785GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 164 166 156 167 165 MB/s
|
100%
Outstanding
|
100% 139 MB/s
|
144% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown IM4AGU88A30-FGGHMB 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
35.2%
Below average
|
35% 12.4 GB/s
|
28% 9.7 GB/s
|
35% 115 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H310M-HDV Builds (Compare 1,226 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H310M-HDV - $60
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 322x |
| Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 317x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 195x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 174x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 119x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 102x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 95% - Outstanding | Total price: $278 |