| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible. |
| Graphics | 0.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Asus ET2010PNT (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK ET2010PNT |
| Memory | 0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20100319 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 20 '19 at 04:22 |
| Run Duration | 190 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 58% |
PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
12.4%
Very poor
|
10% 12.7 Pts
|
2% 12.7 Pts
|
1% 14.9 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia ION
Asus(1043 842F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.92
|
0.75%
Terrible
|
1% 1.25 fps
|
0% 0.64 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 50 33 30 20 27 MB/s
|
11.3%
Very poor
|
17% 23.2 MB/s
|
92% 0.73 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
4GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 4.2 4.5 4.2 4.1 4.1 MB/s
|
5.37%
Terrible
|
9% 7.72 MB/s
|
52% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 41444F564631423136334245472020202020 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz
|
6.78%
Terrible
|
7% 2.3 GB/s
|
4% 1.27 GB/s
|
13% 300 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical ET2010PNT Builds (Compare 2 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus ET2010PNT
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 26% - Poor | Total price: $115 |