Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 12% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom D510-$115 463 User benchmarks, average bench 20% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	Memory 44.3 1-Core 7.3 2-Core 14.1 18% 21.9 Pts	4-Core 21.9 8-Core 22.4 3% 22.1 Pts	64-Core 23 1% 23 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 25%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia ION 1,623 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 842F) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	0.79% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 2.38 Parallax 0.44 1% 1.33 fps	MRender 0.71 Gravity 0.33 Splatting 0.65 0% 0.57 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.79% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 113 130 71 71 50 MB/s Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.6% Average	Read 223 Write 132 Mixed 168 SusWrite 94.2 34% 154 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 27.6 4K Mixed 20.3 74% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 104 82% 114 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 41444F564631423136334245472020202020 1x2GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	10% Very poor	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.17 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 2.8 7% 2.6 GB/s	Latency 183 22% 183 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 10%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Atom D510Intel $115Bench 20%, 463 samples	2x

GPU
IONNvidiaBench 1%, 1,623 samples	2x

RAM
41444F564631423136334245472020202020 1x2GBUnknownBench 8%, 15 samples	2x

Value: 26% - Poor

Total price: $115

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16