PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 70.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z800 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AECh |
Memory | 89.3 GB free of 96.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130130 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 21 '19 at 10:58 |
Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
Run User | IND-User |
Background CPU | 85% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5679
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
|
59.8%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro M6000
Nvidia(10DE 1129) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1152 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 431.2
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
70.2%
Very good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$150
912GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01M02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 156 157 110 153 118 MB/s
|
87.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
323GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 132 132 132 129 132 MB/s
|
72%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
280GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 117 112 113 113 MB/s
|
83.6%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68
318GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 55 55 56 56 MB/s
|
45.4%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 318x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 189x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples | 180x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 161x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 88x |
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples | 68x |
SSD | |
---|---|
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples | 38x |
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 34x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |