To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '16 at 20:55
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User DOM-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5700-$22
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
34.1% Below average
Memory 62.3
1-Core 37.9
2-Core 31.3
33% 43.8 Pts
4-Core 37.9
8-Core 37.1
5% 37.5 Pts
64-Core 40.5
2% 40.5 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 43%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3640323AS 640GB-$174
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC1F Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Read 55.3
Write 58.6
Mixed 24.7
34% 46.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.04
4K Write 0.05
4K Mixed 0.04
7% 0.05 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 4GB
0, 0 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 3.3
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback