Gigabyte GA-B75M-D2V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B75M-D2V (all builds)
Memory	2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121026
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 01 '19 at 10:55
Run Duration	400 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	99%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$187 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	72.2% Very good	Memory 91.2 1-Core 87.5 2-Core 174 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 426 44% 357 Pts	64-Core 438 27% 438 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 72.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% EVGA(3842 6162) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 431.60 Performing below potential (99^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (71 fps cap detected)	58.3% Above average	Lighting 71.5 Reflection 70.8 Parallax 68.4 58% 70.2 fps	MRender 70.8 Gravity 69.4 Splatting 72.9 58% 71 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB 14,293 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 42 44 43 41 40 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 51%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$45 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 35GB free Firmware: 608ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 103 113 112 110 113 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 73%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 457GB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 130 138 173 150 139 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	71.1% Very good	Read 108 Write 87.5 Mixed 66 SusWrite 140 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 107%
USB3.0 1TB 425 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 212GB free Firmware: 8105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 46 44 47 46 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 116 Write 112 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 45.1 66% 89 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 102%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 592GB free Firmware: 0706 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 49 37 49 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Read 94.5 Write 80.2 Mixed 62 SusWrite 44.8 52% 70.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.9 208% 2 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 67%
Seagate Expansion 2TB 49,966 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 785GB free Firmware: 0706 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 38 47 39 51 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Read 83 Write 61.3 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 44.5 44% 59.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 109% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 67%
USB 3.0 2TB 331 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 866GB free Firmware: 0508 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 46 36 46 37 38 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 88.7 Write 91.7 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 41.8 53% 71.2 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 106%
WD My Passport 25E2 3TB 3,377 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 829GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 45 47 47 48 48 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	29% Poor	Read 108 Write 99.5 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 46.6 102% 79 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.2 44% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 59%
WD Elements SE 25FF 4TB 1,938 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 434GB free, PID 25ff Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 45 47 48 49 48 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 74.5 Write 75 Mixed 55 SusWrite 48.1 84% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 0.7 224% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 62%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 700 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 851GB free, PID b207 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 29 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Read 28.5 Write 95.7 Mixed 33.5 SusWrite 28.6 68% 46.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 53%
CHIPSBNK v3.3.9.1 4GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 2093 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.8 3.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	4.41% Terrible	Read 17.5 Write 3.5 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 3.7 8% 7.25 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.41% Great: 6%
TOSHIBA USB DRV 32GB 1,074 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 26GB free, PID 1400 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 8.9 9 9 9.1 9 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	7.77% Terrible	Read 22 Write 7.5 Mixed 10 SusWrite 9 14% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 53% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.77% Great: 23%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB 9,173 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 73GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 51 50 46 41 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	24.7% Poor	Read 84 Write 55.7 Mixed 53 SusWrite 48 77% 60.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.9 57% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 39%
NORELSYS 106X 3TB 138 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 397GB free, PID 1066 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 107 109 109 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	43.4% Average	Read 112 Write 112 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 108 134% 99.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 64% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 73%
LG USB Drive 2GB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.2 4.2 3.9 3.7 4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	2.36% Terrible	Read 6.5 Write 3.5 Mixed 3 SusWrite 4 5% 4.25 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.36% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G3D169DS3J.8FE Kingston 9905471-017.A00LF 8GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.1% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 14.8 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 13.7 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B75M-D2V Builds (Compare 456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D2V

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	64x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	62x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	38x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	53x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	36x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	19x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	14x
240GB SATA SSD 240GBPNYBench 71%, 495 samples	13x

RAM
HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 6,798 samples	9x
CT102464BA160B.C16 Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF 16GBUnknownBench 49%, 20 samples	8x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16