Toshiba Satellite C850

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite C850 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PLCSF8
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131001
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '19 at 08:26
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 2020M 9,778 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Memory 84.6 1-Core 66.7 2-Core 134 58% 94.9 Pts	4-Core 127 8-Core 133 17% 130 Pts	64-Core 135 8% 135 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz) 28,701 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FB31) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.72% Terrible	Lighting 1.73 Reflection 1.81 Parallax 1.38 1% 1.64 fps	MRender 3.67 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 3.52 2% 2.76 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.72% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71F1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 54 54 54 51 54 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.3% Below average	Read 246 Write 100 Mixed 117 SusWrite 85.1 30% 137 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 39.2 4K Mixed 13.2 58% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 93.1 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 129 98% 129 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 85%
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23 40,922 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 195GB free Firmware: AX0A4M SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 95 95 95 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	54% Above average	Read 94.2 Write 92.6 Mixed 31.6 SusWrite 94.1 57% 78.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 62%
Generic- Multi-Card 16GB 320 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 14GB free, PID 0138 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 11 12 11 12 12 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	8.07% Terrible	Read 16.7 Write 3.3 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 11.3 11% 9.52 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.4 86% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 8.07% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMT3160ED58E9W1600 Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 8GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 23 MC Mixed 19.1 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 15 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C850 Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C850

CPU
Celeron B830IntelBench 43%, 3,455 samples	10x
Pentium B960IntelBench 44%, 13,355 samples	10x
Core i3-2350MIntelBench 47%, 24,896 samples	7x

GPU
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	36x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	22x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	3x
120GB 120GBSSDBench 59%, 4,995 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	6x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 8,533 samples	4x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 5,120 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16