Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	11.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	34.3% Below average	Memory 69.3 1-Core 1 2-Core 0.3 23% 23.5 Pts	4-Core 0 8-Core 92.4 4% 46.2 Pts	64-Core 8 0% 8 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 70%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 70 54 69 47 42 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	11.6% Very poor	Read 48.8 Write 86.7 Mixed 78.4 SusWrite 54.8 15% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 11.1 4K Mixed 4.4 15% 6.03 MB/s	DQ Read 20.9 DQ Write 46.7 DQ Mixed 19.1 19% 28.9 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 88%
Hitachi HTS725050A9A364 500GB 7,947 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 458GB free Firmware: PC4OC70E SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 55 50 62 63 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 78.1 Write 49 Mixed 12.6 SusWrite 56.5 35% 49 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.2 57% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown IMT41GU6MFR8C-RA0 1x8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	8.43% Terrible	MC Read 1.2 MC Write 1.6 MC Mixed 1.9 4% 1.57 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 1.2 SC Mixed 6.3 12% 4.17 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.43% Great: 35%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	744x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	179x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	158x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	97x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	55x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 26%, 3,270 samples	40x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16