HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit barev, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111110
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 06 '19 at 15:28
Run Duration	204 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 88.5 1-Core 93.3 2-Core 178 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 336 45% 337 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ocz-vert EX450 256GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 118GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 104 102 99 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Read 321 Write 107 Mixed 144 SusWrite 99.8 37% 168 MB/s	4K Read 17.2 4K Write 30.2 4K Mixed 19.6 67% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 146 116% 164 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 103%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$90 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 16GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 138 132 112 133 132 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	79.3% Very good	Read 145 Write 126 Mixed 81.7 SusWrite 131 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 88%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 52GB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 56 56 60 57 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 93 Write 77.5 Mixed 44.8 SusWrite 57.3 50% 68.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 118% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 83%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$90 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 24GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 63 125 105 42 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 133 Write 120 Mixed 66.5 SusWrite 77.2 73% 99.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 88%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$23 80,932 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 169GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 82 81 83 83 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 110 Write 110 Mixed 56 SusWrite 81.8 66% 89.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 61%
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB 14,066 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 323GB free Firmware: JEDOA50B SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 85 93 94 91 93 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	50.5% Above average	Read 85.7 Write 78.3 Mixed 21.3 SusWrite 90.7 50% 69 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 51%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 420GB free Firmware: 01.01S02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 82 82 82 84 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Read 131 Write 114 Mixed 86.8 SusWrite 81.9 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CH9 OCZ3G16002G M378B5773CH0-CH9 OCZ3G16002G 8GB 1067, 1067, 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.6% Average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 13.1 40% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 11.4 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 69 58% 69 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,770 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	686x
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	598x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	315x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	141x
GTX 1050Nvidia $88Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	86x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	56x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16