PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 9.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 89.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds) |
Memory | 28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20131111 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 26 '19 at 12:29 |
Run Duration | 282 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 3555) 2GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
9.48%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
795GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 337 279 299 344 263 MB/s
|
89.3%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
652GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 89 92 92 93 93 MB/s
|
51.5%
Above average
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
926GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 138 138 138 138 MB/s
|
81.6%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
931GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 100 98 103 103 102 MB/s
|
46.5%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Desktop 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 140 142 141 139 130 MB/s
|
67.6%
Good
|
|||
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B0 1TB
773GB free, PID 0216
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s
|
16.7%
Very poor
|
|||
ST350063 0AS 500GB
370GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 17 16 17 MB/s
|
12.5%
Very poor
|
|||
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 129 133 135 132 134 MB/s
|
65.1%
Good
|
|||
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 11 9.6 11 9.4 MB/s
|
5.89%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
43.2%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 127x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 73x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 59x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 31x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 24x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 21x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $396 |