Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive89.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '19 at 12:29
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
64% Good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 130
59% 95.1 Pts
4-Core 241
8-Core 410
40% 325 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 3555) 2GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.48% Terrible
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 9.77
Parallax 12.2
9% 10.9 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 12.6
Splatting 13.7
11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.48%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
795GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 337 279 299 344 263 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 457
Write 413
Mixed 317
SusWrite 302
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 45.4
143% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 65.3
DQ Mixed 21
54% 121 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 133%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
652GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 89 92 92 93 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 87.5
Write 84.2
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 91.7
59% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
926GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 138 138 138 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 147
Write 120
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 137
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 85%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
931GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 100 98 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 62.5
Write 92
Mixed 10
SusWrite 99.8
48% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
52% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 59%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 140 142 141 139 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 98.2
Write 121
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 136
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.6
218% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 93%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B0 1TB
773GB free, PID 0216
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 23.7
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 27.4
34% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 21%
ST350063 0AS 500GB
370GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 17 16 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 23
Write 15.7
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 16.1
25% 18.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 19%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 129 133 135 132 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 141
Write 151
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 132
173% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 98%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 11 9.6 11 9.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
5.89% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 20.2
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 10.8
19% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.89%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.2% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 11.8
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback